Explore
Articles
Magazines
Store
Events
Media
Donate
Other Languages
SEARCH
Latest
Popular
design-features
Back to
Topics
Previous
Page
13
of
16
(181 Articles)
Next
Is the human pharynx poorly designed?
Evolutionists love to claim that our throat design is too poor for a creator. But its design is actually superior to the hypothetical alternatives.
by
Jerry Bergman
Intelligent Design: why the fuss, and what’s it about?
To some, design is a ‘no-brainer’. To others, it’s the thin edge of the wedge. How should we view it?
by
Carl Wieland
The brain—brainier than believed before
Overturning long-held ideas, new research shows that our brains unconsciously make the ‘best possible’ decisions. But this optimal design makes little sense in a Darwinist scenario.
by
Carl Wieland
Life’s irreducible structure—Part 1: autopoiesis
‘Autopoiesis’ (self-making) shows that all aspects of life lie beyond naturalistic explanations.
by
Alex Williams
Can it bee?
The brilliant design involved in bee flight is being studied for its potential in mini flying robots and more.
by
Jonathan Sarfati
Cows: a magnetic sign for evolutionists
Renowned evolutionist J.B.S. Haldane famously said that evolution could never produce mechanisms such as the wheel and magnet. He was right.
by
David Catchpoole
Surveillance solution: mimicking a bug’s eye view
Inspired by insect vision: new camera technology that can pick up detail in light and dark at the same time.
by
David Catchpoole
Marvellous moth motif
An amazing portrait of a mammal’s face—on the wings of a moth—defies Darwinian explanations in its sheer detail.
by
Emil Silvestru
Peacock poppycock?
Darwin’s attempt to explain how the peacock’s tail evolved is being sharply criticized—by evolutionists.
by
David Catchpoole
Amazing armoured armadillos of the Americas
This mammal with a leathery armour was once rare in Texas, but its ‘conquest’ of that state—and beyond—conveys a strong message.
by
Lael Weinberger
Brilliant brittlestars:
Brittlestars have one huge compound eye, made of an array of perfect microlenses, with hardly any optical distortion. Researchers didn’t dream that nature had such advanced optical technology.
by
Jonathan Sarfati and David Catchpoole
Fibre optics in eye demolish atheistic ‘bad design’ argument
Is our eye harmed by ‘backward wiring’? No! Not only is it necessary, but eyes have a fibre optic plate to guide light through the nerve net to receptors.
by
Jonathan Sarfati
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
200K
EMAIL SUBSCRIBERS
133K
FOLLOWERS
68K
SUBSCRIBERS
49K
FOLLOWERS
19K
FOLLOWERS
9k
FOLLOWERS
Change Settings
Change Country
-- Loading --
City / Postal Code
Why?
Change Language
-- Loading --
Loading...