This commonly asked question has wider implications when the origin of life is considered.

Morphological analysis points to genetic variation within the one human kind, so the case for human evolution collapses.

Peter Line reviews the status of the varied fossils not labelled as ‘Homo’ that evolutionists interpret as our ancestors. He shows that their story does not stack up.

Just because ape-to-human evolution is popular doesn’t make it plausible.

For decades, ‘Lucy’ has been anthropology’s favourite ‘pin-up’ example of evolutionary transition from apes to humans. But she’s just been ignominiously dumped.

Homo erectus 'to' modern man: evolution or human variability?

Homo naledi is another case of selective interpretation of the evidence to ‘prove’ evolution of man from apelike ancestors.

Chimps and humans have similar genomes, right? Wrong! Just look at the Y chromosome.

Six abilities of humans that make us different from animals, and are features of God and thus make us accountable to Him.

This fossil type is widely touted as our ancestor. The discovery of an extremely well-preserved specimen focuses attention on the evidence that things are not what evolutionists would have hoped.

Genetics: Death knell for ape-human evolution?

The existence of radically different evolutionary scenarios of human origins shows that human evolution is no ‘fact’ but an exercise in storytelling.