Progressive creationist Hugh Ross has declared as fact something about the alleged big bang that even evolutionists want to be true but have not claimed.

Not content with everything creating itself from nothing, the latest development in big bang theory even does away with a beginning.

First dark matter, then dark energy; now another mysterious entity is invented to explain a conflict between theory and observation.

Creationists continue to explore the possibilities of how God caused the cosmos to appear as it does.

Media headlines make people think that some astounding scientific ‘proof’ has been discovered. The reality is far less spectacular.

Unexpected features of the Cosmic Background Radiation are hard to explain in a big bang framework.

How should we approach the distant starlight travel time issue? How do we argue against day-age theory?

As biblical creationists, can we know what God did when he created this vast universe?

What does ‘stretching out the heavens like a tent’ mean?

What would we expect the universe to look like if we were near the centre?

Is Stephen Hawking right in claiming a universe could create itself?

Classic article refuting the big bang re-posted after 30 years, with lots of updates but not corrections. The updates reinforce the claims of the originals.